Sun Jul 04, 2004 1:52 pm
alpmaster wrote:Well I kinda do see what PD~ is saying (not about the spelling ofcourse), does make somewhat good sense, even though I'm keeping my point of view.
BUt PD~, USA, not America. No one talks about Canada.
...
Sun Jul 04, 2004 4:29 pm
PD asserted that it takes about 6 years for a pressidents changes to effect the economy and that we coudlnt see what bushes changes would do
i noted that bush is useing hte same trickeldown thoery that reagan used and they didnt work well at all
PD said that the war in kuaite put the effects of those changes on hold
i said that kuait was about 9 years after the start of reagans changes and that it was temporally impoosible for the was to of had effects that could trabvle back in time to change history at the about 6 year mark AND that the war was just barly even a war even the eleit enemy combatans were surrendering to unarmed jurnalists and of the whoping SEVENTY NINE fatailites we had more than 50% were due to friendly fire
and ill not ethat all the other people who have said it takes X amount of time have said 3 years for a president to impact the economy and these are people who have a good deal MORE credibility than PD (the LIE about his boss as ive said before NO commishioned officer would let loose anything of the sort especially to such a youngen as our little PD WHY this fellow is even still working and not living on his penshion is beyond me and i very HIGHLY doubt that one could gain a commishion wihtou having putin enough years to earn a penshion)
Sun Jul 04, 2004 4:49 pm
page two 9th post (you say the same thing a few posts later)See, the true works of a president aren't recognized until roughly the 6th year after his first election.
well ill be damned whats taht i see well its YOU TALKING ABOUT KUWAIT its on page two the 22nd post of that pageSee, the true works of a president aren't recognized until roughly the 6th year after his first election.
as you not only have talked about it recently but also IN this threadI haven't talked about Kuwait in the longest time and certainly not on this thread.
Sun Jul 04, 2004 8:35 pm
See, the true works of a president aren't recognized until roughly the 6th year after his first election.
page two 9th post (you say the same thing a few posts later)
Mon Jul 05, 2004 9:15 am
PD~ wrote:Bush Sr. had a war to deal with
Mon Jul 05, 2004 11:11 am
Mon Jul 05, 2004 12:09 pm
PD~ wrote:You do know that the Gulf War was held in Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and Kuwait, don't you? I mentioned the war as a whole only for one economic point, I wasn't talking about Kuwait. I never even said Kuwait. If I had mentioned World War II, would you think I was talking specifically about the US, Japan, Germany, etc, etc, etc? No. If I was talking about it specifically, I would have made direct mention to it. It wasn't called the Kuwait War. When EBT brought up Kuwait, all I said was that I didn't talk about Kuwait, I just brought up the war. So if you're going to be whining over technicalities, then that's pretty weak and petty and pretty much annoying and the fact that I have to keep wasting posts just to explain the "little" minute differences to you, it pretty much sucks.
Mon Jul 05, 2004 3:46 pm
Mon Jul 05, 2004 4:23 pm
PD~ wrote:I haven't backpedalled at all. I say something, you change what I say, I tell you over and over again what I say only more specifically, you call it backpedalling. You're the one who keeps changing things. I've been staying right on line.
Also, I didn't say I don't remember what my boss told me, I said that I'll tell you what his rank is right down to the very last call number and because I don't know all of it, I'm going to wait so that you can get it all at once, not in little bunches so that I have to hear you whine about how it's not specific enough.
You really need to stop being an instigator and changing the subject nonstop. It's getting a little old.
Mon Jul 05, 2004 7:17 pm
PD~ wrote:See, the true works of a president aren't recognized until roughly the 6th year after his first election.
EBT wrote:PD most everyplace ive heard it says it takes 3 years not 6 and most anyone whos ever been in any sort of finaical job or industry monitering says that a change that will have effect will happen within the first few months saying it takes 6 (it must be six now cause when people said it was three and stuff was still shit they had to back peddle) is just very very sad and very very false
PD~ wrote:Also, I said it takes 6 years to see the true mark (or results) of a president, that doesn't mean that after 3 years like you have said that you wouldn't see the improvements or non-improvements if that's the case.
EBT wrote:your posts about it takeing 6 years to see the effects of an economic strategy are BULLSHIT
Mon Jul 05, 2004 8:02 pm
EBT wrote:PD most everyplace ive heard it says it takes 3 years not 6 and most anyone whos ever been in any sort of finaical job or industry monitering says that a change that will have effect will happen within the first few months saying it takes 6 (it must be six now cause when people said it was three and stuff was still shit they had to back peddle) is just very very sad and very very false
PsymonX wrote:Via post #47 in this very topic.... Read back, EBT didn't bring it up first...
The first time it's brought up, is in your very post
Tue Jul 06, 2004 11:31 am
BlackDth wrote:EBT wrote:PD most everyplace ive heard it says it takes 3 years not 6 and most anyone whos ever been in any sort of finaical job or industry monitering says that a change that will have effect will happen within the first few months saying it takes 6 (it must be six now cause when people said it was three and stuff was still shit they had to back peddle) is just very very sad and very very false
Well, I don't know too much about economic theories, but what happens 3 years after a president's 4th year? Unless they made major changes on their last day in term, wouldn't it be anywhere in the 2 year range that all of their changes take effect, or also anywhere within the 6 year range from when they were elected? Both of your theories meet up perfectly, so why are you calling PD~ sad, false, and full of shit? Or are you saying the changes only occur in a few months? I'm not even sure what your point even is right there. Maybe you should spend more time refining your arguments and more time proofreading your posts because I really can't pick out a definite argument in that quote up there. I mean, I'm not a nitpicky person, but sometimes grammar DOES make a big difference.
Maybe there wouldn't be so much "backpedaling" if you discussed something reasonably instead of proving to everyone that you're ignorant. You're twisting around words instead of contributing to an argument, which shows nothing other than the way these points go over your head.
What are you guys even arguing about? I'm only reading the "topic review" and all I can make out is something about PD~'s boss is a colonel, and EBT thinks he's imaginary, or something. All arguments about backpedaling are shattered when you look at the flow of discussion, and it does nothing other than make EBT look bad, so it really should be Given Up. I thought you guys usually attacked Bush instead of vaguely (and poorly) questioning the accuracy of someone debating on his behalf? It's almost like I anticipate "LOL we should impeach him becuz he pronounced nuclear wrong 8====D~~~ O-8 <--- BUSH" posts, because at least then I can read one sentence instead of 2 pages of post before concluding you deserve to be ignored.
one other thing....
PsymonX wrote:Via post #47 in this very topic.... Read back, EBT didn't bring it up first...
The first time it's brought up, is in your very post
This seems like Backpedaling more than anything
Tue Jul 06, 2004 12:04 pm
Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:23 pm
EBT wrote:im calling his thoery sad and false because (maybe you didnt read what i said) the 3 year one is just as much bullshit and justification for why we never saw any improvement of our econmy durring the reigns of trickledown thoery and voodoo ecinomics PD has made allustions to his boss (a supposed colonel) telling him things that the media woudlnt be allowed to tell the general public thats at best an illogical situation (why in the world would a formal colonel be talking to a 22 year old to begine with and why woudl he risk not only national security (for what other reason could said information STILL be concidered privilaged) and jail time(revealing millitary secrests is a high crime) and now you yourself addmited that yes PD was back peddaling
and to PD telling that dealing with me is like dealing with a brcik wall now yo uknow how i feel everytime i get some southern baptist fundimentalist hounding me
Tue Jul 06, 2004 3:01 pm
Tue Jul 06, 2004 3:22 pm
Wed Jul 07, 2004 5:50 am
PD~ wrote:Haha, do you know what I did? I always thought it was spelled colonal but knew it probably wasn't right, so before I posted it for the first time, I looked it up and realized it was colonel and that's the way I posted it the FIRST time, but then everytime after that for some reason I kept putting colenal.
Besides, most words that I spell incorrectly aren't exactly easy words, especially a word like colonel, which is pronounced (ker-nal). I do get the easy words like "the" or "you'll."
And I agree with you about the rest of your post as well. I'd much rather talk to someone who knows what he's talking about like mrmarcus (who doesn't agree with me, but at least he's knowledgable).
Wed Jul 07, 2004 7:04 am
Thu Jul 08, 2004 5:24 am
Witch King wrote:this would be bush's reaction to people if he was president
Thu Jul 08, 2004 6:44 am
Thu Jul 08, 2004 6:45 am
Your stupidmrmarcus wrote:Witch King wrote:this would be bush's reaction to people if he was president
*scratches head*
Umm... Bush is President and I haven't heard any reports of him clubbing people with hammers.
Thu Jul 08, 2004 7:20 am
Thu Jul 08, 2004 8:15 am
Thu Jul 08, 2004 6:15 pm
PD~ wrote:EBT wrote:im calling his thoery sad and false because (maybe you didnt read what i said) the 3 year one is just as much bullshit and justification for why we never saw any improvement of our econmy durring the reigns of trickledown thoery and voodoo ecinomics PD has made allustions to his boss (a supposed colonel) telling him things that the media woudlnt be allowed to tell the general public thats at best an illogical situation (why in the world would a formal colonel be talking to a 22 year old to begine with and why woudl he risk not only national security (for what other reason could said information STILL be concidered privilaged) and jail time(revealing millitary secrests is a high crime) and now you yourself addmited that yes PD was back peddaling
and to PD telling that dealing with me is like dealing with a brcik wall now yo uknow how i feel everytime i get some southern baptist fundimentalist hounding me
Actually, BlackDth was saying that Psymon X was backpedalling for you, not me. BlackDth agrees with me.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.